Differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma by time-dependent diffusion using oscillating gradient.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to elucidate the impact of effective diffusion time setting on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-based differentiation between primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs) and glioblastomas (GBMs) and to investigate the usage of time-dependent diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted involving 21 patients with PCNSLs and 66 patients with GBMs using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequences with oscillating gradient spin-echo (Δeff = 7.1 ms) and conventional pulsed gradient (Δeff = 44.5 ms). In addition to ADC maps at the two diffusion times (ADC7.1 ms and ADC44.5 ms), we generated maps of the ADC changes (cADC) and the relative ADC changes (rcADC) between the two diffusion times. Regions of interest were placed on enhancing regions and non-enhancing peritumoral regions. The mean and the fifth and 95th percentile values of each parameter were compared between PCNSLs and GBMs. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values were used to compare the discriminating performances among the indices. RESULTS: In enhancing regions, the mean and fifth and 95th percentile values of ADC44.5 ms and ADC7.1 ms in PCNSLs were significantly lower than those in GBMs (p = 0.02 for 95th percentile of ADC44.5 ms, p = 0.04 for ADC7.1 ms, and p < 0.01 for others). Furthermore, the mean and fifth and 95th percentile values of cADC and rcADC were significantly higher in PCNSLs than in GBMs (each p < 0.01). The AUC of the best-performing index for ADC7.1 ms was significantly lower than that for ADC44.5 ms (p < 0.001). The mean rcADC showed the highest discriminating performance (AUC = 0.920) among all indices. In peritumoral regions, no significant difference in any of the three indices of ADC44.5 ms, ADC7.1 ms, cADC, and rcADC was observed between PCNSLs and GBMs. CONCLUSIONS: Effective diffusion time setting can have a crucial impact on the performance of ADC in differentiating between PCNSLs and GBMs. The time-dependent diffusion MRI parameters may be useful in the differentiation of these lesions.

Oscillating Gradient Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Risk Stratification of Uterine Endometrial Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Oscillating gradient diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) enables elucidation of microstructural characteristics in cancers; however, there are limited data to evaluate its utility in patients with endometrial cancer. PURPOSE: To investigate the utility of oscillating gradient DWI for risk stratification in patients with uterine endometrial cancer compared with conventional pulsed gradient DWI. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: Sixty-three women (mean age: 58 [range: 32-85] years) with endometrial cancer. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3 T MRI including DWI using oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE) and pulsed gradient spin-echo (PGSE) research sequences. ASSESSMENT: Mean value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for OGSE (ADCOGSE ) and PGSE (ADCPGSE ) as well as the ADC ratio (ADCOGSE /ADCPGSE ) within endometrial cancer were measured using regions of interest. Prognostic factors (histological grade, deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular invasion, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] stage, and prognostic risk classification) were tabulated. STATISTICAL TESTS: Interobserver agreement was analyzed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient. The associations of ADCOGSE , ADCPGSE , and ADCOGSE /ADCPGSE with prognostic factors were examined using the Kendall rank correlation coefficient, Mann-Whitney U test, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. A P value of <0.05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: Compared with ADCOGSE and ADCPGSE , ADCOGSE /ADCPGSE was significantly and strongly correlated with histological grade (observer 1, τ = 0.563; observer 2, τ = 0.456), FIGO stage (observer 1, τ = 0.354; observer 2, τ = 0.324), and prognostic risk classification (observer 1, τ = 0.456; observer 2, τ = 0.385). The area under the ROC curves of ADCOGSE /ADCPGSE for histological grade (observer 1, 0.92, 95% confidence intervals [CIs]: 0.83-0.98; observer 2, 0.84, 95% CI: 0.73-0.92) and prognostic risk (observer 1, 0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.89; observer 2, 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.86) were significantly higher than that of ADCOGSE and ADCPGSE . DATA CONCLUSION: The ADC ratio obtained via oscillating gradient and pulsed gradient DWIs might be useful imaging biomarkers for risk stratification in patients with endometrial cancer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Differentiating brain metastasis from glioblastoma by time-dependent diffusion MRI.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to investigate the use of time-dependent diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters in distinguishing between glioblastomas and brain metastases. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted involving 65 patients with glioblastomas and 27 patients with metastases using a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence with oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE, 50 Hz) and a conventional pulsed gradient spin-echo (PGSE, 0 Hz) sequence. In addition to apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from two sequences (ADC50Hz and ADC0Hz), we generated maps of the ADC change (cADC): ADC50Hz - ADC0Hz and the relative ADC change (rcADC): (ADC50Hz - ADC0Hz)/ ADC0Hz × 100 (%). RESULTS: The mean and the fifth and 95th percentile values of each parameter in enhancing and peritumoral regions were compared between glioblastomas and metastases. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of the best discriminating indices were compared. In enhancing regions, none of the indices of ADC0Hz and ADC50Hz showed significant differences between metastases and glioblastomas. The mean cADC and rcADC values of metastases were significantly higher than those of glioblastomas (0.24 ± 0.12 × 10-3mm2/s vs. 0.14 ± 0.03 × 10-3mm2/s and 23.3 ± 9.4% vs. 14.0 ± 4.7%; all p < 0.01). In peritumoral regions, no significant difference in all ADC indices was observed between metastases and glioblastomas. The AUC values for the mean cADC (0.877) and rcADC (0.819) values in enhancing regions were significantly higher than those for ADC0Hz5th (0.595; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The time-dependent diffusion MRI parameters may be useful for differentiating brain metastases from glioblastomas.

Value of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Detecting Small Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to evaluate the usefulness of virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) generated from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) in detecting small pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). METHODS: This study included 82 patients pathologically diagnosed with small PDAC (≤30 mm) and 20 without pancreatic tumors who underwent triple-phase contrast-enhanced DECT. To assess diagnostic performance for small PDAC detection via a receiver operating characteristic analysis, 3 observers reviewed 2 image sets (conventional computed tomography [CT] set and combined image set [conventional CT + 40-keV VMI from DECT]). The tumor-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio was compared between conventional CT and 40-keV VMI from DECT. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the 3 observers were 0.97, 0.96, and 0.97 in conventional CT set and 0.99, 0.99, and 0.99 in combined image set (P = 0.017-0.028), respectively. The combined image set yielded a better sensitivity than the conventional CT set (P = 0.001-0.023), without a loss of specificity (all P > 0.999). The tumor-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratios of 40-keV VMI from DECT were approximately threefold higher than those of conventional CT at all phases. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 40-keV VMI from DECT to conventional CT had better sensitivity for detecting small PDACs without compromising specificity.